MAPPING INEQUALITY IN ACCESS TO R&D: A DUAL BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE GLOBAL RESEARCH LANDSCAPE

This study examines how inequality in access to research and development (R&D) is represented within the global research landscape and why it remains weakly consolidated as an independent analytical category. Drawing on bibliographic records retrieved from Scopus and the Web of Science Core Collection for 2014 – 2025, the study applies author – keyword co – occurrence analysis to examine the thematic structure of research related to regional innovation, spatial inequality, economic geography, and research capacity. The integrated dataset contains 7,592 records. Using a minimum occurrence threshold of five, 106 author keywords were retained and organized into nine thematic clusters. The resulting network is dominated by established themes such as regional development, peripheral regions, core – periphery relations, regional innovation, and spatial inequality, while terminology explicitly referring to R&D access appears comparatively weak and fragmented. The findings therefore provide bibliometric evidence of limited thematic consolidation around R&D access rather than establishing it as an empirically validated dimension of inequality. Building on this pattern, the study proposes R&D access as a distinct analytical dimension of regional inequality and outlines three conceptual forms – material, cognitive, and institutional access-for future empirical investigation.

1. Armbrecht, F.M.R. Jr., Chapas, R.B., Chappelow, C.C., Farris, G.F., Friga, P.N., Hartz, C.A., McIlvaine, M.E., Postle, S.R., and Whitwell, G.E. Knowledge management in research and development. Research Technology Management, 44 (4), 28–48 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2001.11671438

2. Asheim, B., and Coenen, L. The role of regional innovation systems in a globalizing economy. In: Vertova, G. (ed.) The Changing Economic Geography of Globalization (Routledge, 2006), pp. 139–155. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203000403-9

3. Asheim, B.T., Grillitsch, M., and Trippl, M. Regional innovation systems: past–present–future. In: Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016), pp. 45–62.

4. Sterlacchini, A. R&D, higher education and regional growth: uneven linkages among European regions. Research Policy, 37 (6–7), 1096–1107 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.009

5. Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., and Van de Ven, A.H. Perspectives on innovation processes. Academy of Management Annals, 7 (1), 775–819 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.791066

6. Shujahat, M., Sousa, M.J., Hussain, S., Nawaz, F., Wang, M., and Umer, M. Translating the impact of knowledge management processes into knowledge-based innovation: the neglected and mediating role of knowledge-worker productivity. Journal of Business Research, 94, 442–450 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.001

7. Fischer, M.M. Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of innovation. The Annals of Regional Science, 35 (2), 199–216 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001680000034

8. Ortega, A.M., and Serna, M. Determinants of innovation performance of organizations in a regional innovation system from a developing country. International Journal of Innovation Science, 12 (3), 345–362 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-03-2020-0023

9. Audretsch, D.B., and Feldman, M.P. Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In: Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004), Vol. 4, pp. 2713–2739.

10. Kim, S. Spatial inequality and economic development: theories, facts, and policies. In: Urbanization and Growth (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2008), pp. 133–166.

11. McCann, P., and Van Oort, F. Theories of agglomeration and regional economic growth: a historical review. In: Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019), pp. 6–23.

12. Copus, A.K. From core-periphery to polycentric development: concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality. European Planning Studies, 9 (4), 539–552 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/713666491

13. Camagni, R., and Capello, R. Knowledge-based economy and knowledge creation: the role of space. In: Growth and Innovation of Competitive Regions: The Role of Internal and External Connections (Berlin: Springer, 2009), pp. 145–165.

14. Parente, S. The failure of endogenous growth. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 13 (4), 49–58 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02693989

15. Desmet, K., Greif, A., and Parente, S.L. Spatial competition, innovation and institutions: the Industrial Revolution and the Great Divergence. Journal of Economic Growth, 25 (1), 1–35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-019-09173-3

16. van Eck, N.J., and Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 523–538 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

17. Zupic, I., and Čater, T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18 (3), 429–472 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

18. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., and Lim, W.M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

19. Kozlowski, D., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C.R., and Monroe-White, T. Intersectional inequalities in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119 (2), e2113067119 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113067119

20. Servedio, V.D.P., Ferreira, M.R., Reisz, N., Costas, R., and Thurner, S. Scale-free growth in regional scientific capacity building explains long-term scientific dominance. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 167, 113020 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.113020