ON METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT OF CHANNELS ALONG THE PERIMETER

The scientific article deals with the issues of uniform movement of the riverbed and the determination of the roughness coefficient of the riverbed (roughness coefficient). The analysis of existing methods for calculating the difference in the roughness coefficients of channels along the perimeter, methods for determining the roughness coefficient of the slopes of channels consisting of two or three parts along the perimeter, well–known scientists - P.N.Belokon, G.K.Lotter, N.N.Pavlovsky are given.There are a some varieties of calculation methods assigned for hydraulic calculations of water flow along the perimeter of a soil channel in the field of hydraulic engineering. A number of researchers states that the roughness of the channel bed imitates the motion of the flow in diverse channels with the movement of the flow under the ice layer. Nevertheless, it should be taken into account that the roughness of the channel bed has its own characteristic (specific) features of the movement of water in different open channels and below the ice cover. The common formulas proposed by number of authors for channels with different roughness along the perimeter cannot be used directly in hydraulic calculations of the flow under the ice cover, and vice versa, the equations of motion of water flow beneath the ice cover are not applied even for channels with various roughness along the perimeter. Therefore, the corresponding choice of methods for determining the roughness coefficients of the canal flow along the perimeter will be the key point to its long-term functioning.

1. Musin Zh.A. (2012) Metodologicheskie obosnovanija propusknoj sposobnosti kanalov s sostavnoj sherohovatost’ju po perimetru, Taraz, TOO “Format-print”, 232 p. (In Russian)

2. Chou V.T. (1969) Gidravlika otkrytyh kanalov, Moscow, Izdatel’stvo literatury po stroitel’stvu, 464 p. (In Russian)

3. Joldasov S.Q. (2012) Aşyq ağyndar gidravlikasy, Taraz, Taraz universitetı, 125 p. (In Kazakh)

4. Joldasov S.Q. (2016) Tabiği (bolmystyq) jağdailarda būjyrlyq koefisientın anyqtau qiynşylyqtary turaly, «Ğylym jäne bılım: ızdenıs, mındetter, bolaşaq» Respublikalyq ğylymi-praktikalyq konferensiasynyñ materialdary, Taraz, Taraz universitetı, pp. 84–88. (In Kazakh)

5. Musin Zh.A., Orynbekov B.A. (2005) Kanaly s sostavnoj sherohovatost’ju po perimetru, Trudy Mezhd. nauch. konf. «Nauka i obrazovanie – vedushhij faktor strategii «Kazahstan-2030» (28–29 ijunja 2005 g.), Karaganda, KargTU, pp. 324–336. (In Russian)

6. Musin Zh.A., Sarsekeev S.A. (1989) Vlijanie sezonnogo rosta vodnoj rastitel’nosti na propusknuju sposobnost’ kanalov, Proektirovanie, stroitel’stvo i jekspluatacija vodohozjajstvennyh sistem : Tezisy dokladov k zonal’nomu seminaru, Penza, pp. 41–43. (In Russian)

7. Musin Zh.A., Kazhkenov M.Z. (1989) K voprosu racional’nogo ispol’zovanija orositel’noj vody, Jekologicheskoe sovershenstvovanie meliorativnyh sistem: Tezisy dokladov Vsesojuznoj nauch. prak. konf. molodyh uchenyh, VNIIGiM, Moscow, 258 p. (In Russian)

8. Grishanin K.V., Gladkov G.L., Pavyshi A.M., Moskal’ A.V., Sokolov Ju.P. (1988) Reakcija rechnogo potoka na iskusstvennye izmenenija ego rusla, Trudy V Vsesojuzn. gidrol. s#ezda, Moscow, v. 10, pp. 362–373. (In Russian)

9. Grishanin K.V. (1992) Gidravlicheskoe soprotivlenie estestvennyh rusel, Sankt-Peterburg, Gidrometeoizdatб 182 p. (In Russian)

10. Shiperko E.Je. (1961) Issledovanija soprotivlenija zhidkosti v sluchae neodnorodnoj sherohovatosti, Izvestija Dnepropetrovskogo gornogo institute, Dnepropetrovsk, vol. 40, pp. 272–282. (In Russian)

11. Ros’ U.S. (1967) Izmenenie privedennogo kojefficienta sherohovatosti v zavisimosti ot glubiny potoka pod ledjanym pokrovom, Tr. Novosibirskij in-t inzh. zh/d transporta, Novosibirsk, vyp.60, pp.113–118. (In Russian)

12. Musin Zh.A., Sennikov M.N. (2002) Osnovnye faktory, narushajushhie nadezhnuju rabotu orositel’nyh sistem, i jekspluatacionnye zatrudnenija v opredelenii kojefficienta sherohovatosti v naturnyh uslovijah, Vodnye resursy Central’noj Azii, Materialy nauch.-prak.konf. posv. 10-letiju MKVK, Almaty, pp. 409–410. (In Russian)

13. Nikuradse J. (1942) Laminare Reibungsschichtenan der langsangestromten Platte. Zentrale f. wiss. Berichtswesen, Berlin.

14. Al’tshul’ A.D., Ludov V.D. (1984) O formule N.N. Pavlovskogo dlja opredelenija kojefficienta Shezi, Stroitel’stvo i arhitektura, no 4, pp. 23–30. (In Russian)

15. Al’tshul’ A.D. (1952) Obobshhennaja formula kojefficienta Shezi dlja otkrytyh rusel, Meteorologija i gidrologija, no 7. (In Russian)

16. Al’tshul’A.D., Srejo A. (1987) O gidravlicheskih soprotivlenijah v vodotokah s bol’shimi uklonami, Gidravlicheskie issledovanija i raschety truboprovodnyh sistem i portovyh sooruzhenij, Sb.nauchnyh trudov. MISI im. V.V. Kujbysheva, Moscow, pp. 28–33. (In Russian)

17. Al’tshul’ A.D., U-Vin-Tejn (1973) Sravnenie formul bez kojefficienta sherohovatosti dlja opredelenija srednej skorosti techenija vody v rekah, Gidrotehnicheskoe stroitel’stvo, L., pp. 41–42. (In Russian)

18. Pavlovskij N.N. (1931) K voprosu o raschetnoj formule ravnomernogo dvizhenija v vodotokah s neodnorodnymi stenkami, Izv.VNIIG, vol.3, pp. 157–165. (In Russian)

19. Agroskin I.I., Shterenliht D.V. (1979) Utochnennaja formula dlja kojefficienta Shezi, Gidrotehnika i melioracija, no11, pp. 25–31. (In Russian)

20. Mihalev M.A. (1981) K voprosu o soprotivlenii otkrytyh rusel s neodnorodnoj sherohovatost’ju lozha, Izv. VNIIG, no 145, pp. 100–105. (In Russian)

21. Sarsekeev S.A., Musin Zh.A. (1990) Delenie potoka vody pod vlijaniem sherohovatostej stenok i dna kanala po smochennomu perimetru rusla, Vestnik s/h.nauki Kazahstana, no 4, pp. 92–95. (In Russian)

22. Musin Zh.A. (2006) Raschet privedennogo kojefficienta sherohovatosti rusel kanalov, Novosti nauki Kazahstana, Almaty, no 4 (88), pp. 72–76. (In Russian)

23. Jandosov D., Kirgizbekov A.S., Baijigitova M.T. Jasandy arna tabanynyñ būjyrlyq koefisientın tañdau, “Ğylym jäne jañaşyldyq – 2015” respublikalyq ğylymi-täjıribelık konferensiasynyñ materialdary, TarMU, 13 nauryz, 2015 j. (In Kazakh)

24. Baijigitova M.T. Tıkbūryşty arnaly qimanyñ būjyrlyq koefisientın täjıribelık jolmen anyqtau: Materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii “Menedzhment kachestva: poisk i reshenija”, Los-Andzheles, Kalifornija, SshA, 25–27 nojabrja 2020 g., pp. 300–306. (In Kazakh)

25. Joldasov S.Q. (2020) Tabiği (bolmystyq) jağdailarda arna tabanynyñ būjyrlyq koefisientın anyqtau qiynşylyqtary, Profesor Seiıtqaziev Ädeubai Sadaqbaiūlynyñ 70 jyldyğyna orai ūiymdastyrylğan “Törtınşı önerkäsıptık revolüsia jağdaiyndağy su şaruaşylyğynyñ agroönerkäsıptık keşenı jäne meliorasiadağy ekologialyq mäseleler” atty Halyqaralyq ğylymi-täjıribelık konferensia materialdary, Taraz, Taraz universitetı, .pp.114–118. (In Kazakh)

26. Amangaliūly A. (2020) Tabany būjyrly kanaldardağy bırqalypty qozğalys jäne būjyrlyq koefisientın anyqtau, Global’naja nauka i innovacija 2020: Central’naja Azija, no 6 (11), Astana, vol. 2, pp. 116–120. (In Kazakh)

27. Qojamqūlova G.E. Jergılıktı şaiyludan qorğauğa arnalğan jasandy būjyrlyqty jalğastyru qūrylymdarynyñ jaña konstruksialary: M.R.Qasenov 80 jyldyğyna orai ötkızılgen “Aimaqtyq ekonomikanyñ bäsekege qabılettılık mäselelerı: teoria jäne praktika” taqyrybyndağy halyqaralyq ğylymi-täjıribelık konferensiasynyñ materialdary, 5 qaraşa 2021 j., pp. 205–209. (In Kazakh)

28. Baijigitova M. Topyraq arnaly kanaldardağy būjyrlyq koefisientın anyqtau, The ІV International Scientific and Practical Conference “Actual problems of practice and science and methods of their solution”, January 31 – February 02, 2022, Milan, Italy, pp. 616–620. (In Kazakh)

29. Joldasov S.Q. (2022) Perimetrı boiynşa būjyrlyq koefisientı ärtürlı kanaldardağy su qozğalysy, Mehanika jäne tehnologialar, no1., pp. 78–86. (In Kazakh)