RESERVOIR PERFORMANCE SIMULATION AND PROCESS-TO-SIMULATOR QUALITY CONTROL TO SUPPORT EOR METHOD SELECTION IN CARBONATE-CONTAINING RESERVOIRS

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) selection requires reservoir performance simulation that reproduces not only production trends but also the physical mechanisms controlling pressure, fluid behavior, multiphase flow, gas mobility, well constraints, and long-term reservoir response. This study presents a reservoir performance simulation and process-to-simulator quality-control workflow for CO₂-based EOR evaluation in anonymized carbonatecontaining Field X, Kazakhstan. The field-scale simulation uses a three-dimensional ECLIPSE E300 compositional model with 93 × 88 × 78 grid cells, 194,413 active cells, and a 40-year forecast period. The framework integrates compositional pressure-volume-temperature/equation-of-state (PVT/EOS) behavior, minimum miscibility pressure (MMP), three-phase relative permeability, hysteresis, vertical connectivity and gravity override, injection scheduling, bottomhole-pressure (BHP) control, wellbore thermal response, CO₂ tracking, and mass-balance verification. Each mechanism is linked to a simulator functional block, diagnostic output, sensitivity test, and acceptance criterion. A representative ECLIPSE E300 process-to-code sequence – RUNSPEC, GRID, PROPS, SOLUTION, SCHEDULE, SUMMARY, followed by MATLAB post-processing – provides traceability from reservoir physics to forecast interpretation. Sensitivity analysis identifies vertical connectivity, gas relative permeability, MMP uncertainty, fault transmissibility, hysteresis, and BHP constraints as the principal controls on simulated reservoir performance. Continuous CO₂ injection increases cumulative oil production from 17.96 to 25.37 Mt, yielding 7.41 Mt of incremental oil (+41.3%); at year 40, the CO₂ case maintains 238.6 t/d while the Base case declines to zero. The results demonstrate that reservoir performance simulation provides a rigorous engineering basis for forecasting reservoir behavior, quantifying model sensitivity, validating physical consistency, and supporting defensible EOR method selection.

1. Lee, H.-S.; Cho, J.; Lee, Y.-W.; Lee, K.-S. Compositional Modeling of Impure CO₂ Injection for Enhanced Oil Recovery and CO₂ Storage. Applied Sciences 2021, 11(17), 7907. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11177907.

2. Song, Y.; Song, Z.; Chen, Z.; Mo, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Tian, S. Simulation of CO₂ enhanced oil recovery and storage in shale oil reservoirs: Unveiling the impacts of nano-confinement and oil composition. Advances in Geo-Energy Research 2024, 13(2), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2024.08.05.

3. Sharma, M. CO₂ Mobility Control with Foam for Enhanced Oil Recovery and Associated Storage: Multi-scale Approach for Field Application. PhD thesis, University of Stavanger, 2019.

4. Khan, M.Y. Mathematical model and its solution for water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection process incorporating the effect of miscibility, gravity, viscous fingering and permeability heterogeneity. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology 2024, 14(12), 3183–3211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-024-01884-7.

5. Luo, Q.; Li, Y.; Sun, H.; Liu, S.; Yu, Y.; Yang, Z. Research on CO₂-WAG in Thick Reservoirs: Geological Influencing Factors and Random Forest Importance Evaluation. ACS Omega 2024, 9(31), 34118– 34127. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c04901.

6. Chiaramonte, L. Geomechanical Characterization and Reservoir Simulation of a CO₂ Sequestration Project in a Mature Oil Field, Teapot Dome, WY. PhD dissertation, Stanford University, 2008.

7. Ruciński, P. Geomechanical Integrity of Offshore Oil Reservoir During EOR-CO₂ Process: A Case Study. Energies 2025, 18(21), 5751. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215751.

8. Samuel, R.J. Transient Flow Modelling of Carbon Dioxide Injection into Depleted Gas Fields. PhD thesis, University College London, 2019.

9. Zhang, Y.; Huang, X.; Jiang, L.; Song, Y. Numerical Simulation of Heat Transfer Characteristics of CO₂ Gas Mixture Injection into Wellbores. Energy & Fuels 2024, 38(21), 21065–21078. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04202.

10. Popova, O.H. Development of Geostatistical Models to Estimate CO₂ Storage Resource in Sedimentary Geologic Formations. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2014.

11. Farshidi, S.F. Compositional Reservoir Simulation-Based Reactive-Transport Formulations, with Application to CO₂ Storage in Sandstone and Ultramafic Formations. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2016.

12. Niu, B. CO₂ Flooding in Chalk Reservoirs: Experiments with X-Ray Computed Tomography and Reactive Transport Modelling. PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark, 2010.

13. Niyazbayeva, A.B.; Merbayev, R.B.; Samenov, Y.R.; Zholdybayeva, A.T.; Kozhagulova, A.A.; Shabdirova, A.D. Laboratory Investigation of Miscible CO₂-Induced Enhanced Oil Recovery from the EastSouthern Pre-Caspian Region. Processes 2025, 13, 2566. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082566.

14. Nam, L.N.H. Study on Enhanced Oil Recovery by CO₂ Microbubbles Injection. PhD dissertation, Kyushu University, 2022.