CONSTRUCTION OF AN ANNOTATED MEDICAL TEXT CORPUS FOR INFORMATION EXTRACTION ON GENETIC DISEASES
https://doi.org/10.55452/1998-6688-2026-23-2-171-186
Abstract
The article presents an annotated corpus consisting of clinical texts in Russian, obtained by exomic sequencing. This corpus was developed to support the tasks of automatically identifying named objects and semantic relationships in relation to genes, mutations, hereditary diseases, phenotypic traits and their clinical significance. During the formation of the corpus, reports of actual clinical exomic sequencing were used, the data went through the stages of preliminary anonymization and text normalization. The labeling process used international standards and knowledge bases such as HGVS, OMIM, ClinVar, and HPO, and ensured consistency and accuracy of biomedical information. The corpus contains more than 25,000 biomedical objects and more than 6,000 semantic links, making it an important resource in the field of clinical genetics in terms of volume and content. The annotation was carried out manually with the participation of several experts, and the results were compared by cross-checking, and the level of agreement between the annotators was assessed using special indicators. The results obtained indicate the high quality and reliability of the case. The finished corpus makes it possible to effectively use natural language processing models in the field of medical genetics for teaching and evaluation, development of clinical decision support systems, and applied research for structuring genetic data.
About the Authors
M. SambetbayevaKazakhstan
PhD, Associate Professor.
Almaty, Astana
S. Serikbaeyva
Kazakhstan
PhD, Acting Associate Professor.
Almaty, Astana
A. Sultangaziyeva
Kazakhstan
Master, PhD student.
Almaty, Astana
N. Mukazhanov
Kazakhstan
PhD, Associate Professor.
Almaty
B. Abdy-galym
Kazakhstan
Master, PhD student.
Almaty, Astana
References
1. Rare Diseases International. Rare Diseases International (online). URL: https://rarediseasesinternational.org (accessed: 13.11.2025).
2. Nguengang Wakap, S., Lambert, D.M., Olry, A., et al. Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database. European Journal of Human Genetics, 28, 165–173 (2020).
3. Wang, Y., Wang, L., Rastegar-Mojarad, M., et al. Clinical information extraction applications: A literature review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 103, 103466 (2020).
4. Cohen, T., Whitfield, G., and Xu, H. Extracting genetic variant information from the literature. Database (Oxford), 2020, baz158 (2020).
5. Bangalore, S., Hegde, H., Bharadwaj, A., et al. Extraction and normalization of mutations in free text using biomedical named entity recognition models. Bioinformatics, 37 (7), 949–957 (2021).
6. Névéol, A., Zweigenbaum, P., and Roberts, A. Clinical natural language processing in 2020: State of the art and future challenges. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 110, 103604 (2020).
7. Yoon, W., Lee, J., Kim, S., et al. Pre-trained language models for biomedical natural language processing. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22 (6), 1686–1702 (2020).
8. Li, M., Lu, Y., Shen, H., et al. BioCreative V CDR task corpus: a resource for chemical disease relation extraction. Database, 2016, baw068 (2016).
9. Bada, M., Eckert, M., Evans, D., et al. Concept annotation in the CRAFT corpus. BMC Bioinformatics, 13 (1), 161 (2012).
10. Zhao, W., Wu, X., Ma, Y., et al. BioRED: A biomedical relation extraction dataset for complex relation types. Bioinformatics, 38 (8), 2210–2216 (2022).
11. Gurulingappa, H., Mateen, A., and Dima, A. NEREL-BIO: A new resource for biomedical named entity recognition and classification in Russian. Proceedings of the LREC Conference (2024).
12. Tutubalina, E., Miftahutdinov, Z., Nikolenko, S., and Panchenko, A. Named entity recognition in Russian: Data, analysis, and model. Proceedings of the EMNLP Conference, 5284–5295 (2020).
13. den Dunnen, J.T., and Antonarakis, S.E. Mutation nomenclature extensions and suggestions to describe complex mutations: a discussion. Human Mutation, 15 (1), 7–12 (2000).
14. Lee, J., Yoon, W., Kim, S., et al. BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining. Bioinformatics, 36 (4), 1234–1240 (2020).
15. Gu, Y., Tinn, R., Cheng, H., et al. Domain-specific language model pretraining for biomedical natural language processing. ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare, 3 (1), Article 2 (2021).
16. Islamaj, R., Kim, S., Kwon, D., et al. NCBI disease corpus: a resource for disease name recognition and concept normalization. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 92, 103132 (2019).
17. Chen, J. PDFPlumber: PDF text extraction library (online). URL: https://github.com/jsvine/pdfplumber
18. C2 Team. (n.d.). python-docx: Python library for creating and updating Microsoft Word (.docx) files. GitHub. URL: https://github.com/python-openxml/python-docx (accessed: 13.11.2025).
19. C2 Team. python-docx: Python library for creating and updating Microsoft Word (.docx) files (online). URL: https://github.com/python-openxml/python-docx
20. Tkachenko, M., Malyuk, M., Shevchenko, N., & Holubiev, B. (2023). Label Studio: Data labeling software. GitHub. URL: https://github.com/heartexlabs/label-studi (accessed: 13.11.2025).
21. Seal, R.L., et al. Genenames.org: the HGNC resources in 2023. Nucleic Acids Research, 51, D1003– D1009 (2023).
22. Tkachenko, M., Malyuk, M., Shevchenko, N., and Holubiev, B. Label Studio: Data labeling software (online). URL: https://github.com/heartexlabs/label-studio (accessed: 1.01.2023).
23. Richards, S., et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the ACMG and AMP. Genetics in Medicine, 17 (5), 405–424 (2015).
24. Amberger, J.S., Bocchini, C.A., Scott, A.F., and Hamosh, A. OMIM. org: leveraging knowledge across phenotype-gene relationships. Nucleic Acids Research, 47, D1038–D1043 (2019).
25. Köhler, S., et al. The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2021. Nucleic Acids Research, 49, D1207– D1217 (2021).
26. Landrum, M.J., et al. ClinVar: improvements to accessing data. Nucleic Acids Research, 48, D835– D844 (2020).
27. Sherry, S.T., et al. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Research, 29, 308– 311 (2001).
28. Marrero, M., Urbano, J., Sánchez-Cuadrado, S., Morato, J., and Gómez-Berbís, J.M. Named entity recognition: Fallacies, challenges and opportunities. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 35 (5), 482–489 (2013).
29. Bodenreider, O. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, 267–270 (2004).
30. Yang, X., Saha, S., Venkatesan, A., Tirunagari, S., Vartak, V., and McEntyre, J. Europe PMC annotated full-text corpus for gene/proteins, diseases and organisms. Scientific Data, 10, Article 722 (2023).
Review
For citations:
Sambetbayeva M., Serikbaeyva S., Sultangaziyeva A., Mukazhanov N., Abdy-galym B. CONSTRUCTION OF AN ANNOTATED MEDICAL TEXT CORPUS FOR INFORMATION EXTRACTION ON GENETIC DISEASES. Herald of the Kazakh-British Technical University. 2026;23(2):171-186. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.55452/1998-6688-2026-23-2-171-186
JATS XML






