AI-BASED ENERGY FORECASTING AND IMPROVED DEMAND MANAGEMENT IN SMART HOMES

This paper presents a comprehensive multi-stage system designed to improve the accuracy of energy load forecasts and evaluate the effectiveness of both forecast models and demand response (DR) strategies. Using the REFIT dataset, a comparative analysis of a hierarchy of forecast models was conducted, including linear regression, random forest, SVR, k-NN, LSTM, and a hybrid encoder-decoder with an attention mechanism. The results of the study indicated that the developed hybrid encoder-decoder model with an attention mechanism achieved the best accuracy (R² = 0.91, MAPE = 2.39%), demonstrating excellent ability to capture complex temporal patterns in the data. Rigorous multi-stage testing confirmed the stability and high generalizability of this deep learning model. The highly accurate forecast was incorporated into a mixed integer linear programming (MILP)-based model for home energy management system (HEMS) optimization. The results indicated that this complex framework significantly reduced energy costs by 28.7% and reduced peak load by 37.1% through optimal appliance scheduling. This work demonstrates how to effectively combine state-of-the-art artificial intelligence (AI)-based forecasting with formal energy optimization in a single, comprehensive system. This method not only allows for more accurate consumption forecasting, especially during peak hours, but also demonstrates that AI can significantly improve the flexibility of energy networks and the energy efficiency of smart homes.

1. Arastehfar, S., Matinkia, M., Jabbarpour, M. Short-term residential load forecasting using Graph Convolutional Recurrent Neural Networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 116 (1), 105358 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105358.

2. Gonzalez, R., Ahmed, S., & Alamaniotis, M. Implementing Very-Short-Term Forecasting of Residential Load Demand Using a Deep Neural Network Architecture. Energies, 16 (9), 3636 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093636.

3. Chatuanramtharnghaka, B., Deb, S., & Singh, K. Short-Term Load Forecasting for IEEE 33 Bus Test System using SARIMAX. IEEE 2nd International Conference on Industrial Electronics: Developments & Applications (ICIDeA), Imphal, India, 275–280 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIDeA59866.2023.10295066.

4. Lee, G-C. A Regression-Based Method for Monthly Electric Load Forecasting in South Korea. Energies, 17 (23), 5860-5875 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/en17235860.

5. Al-Turjman, F., & Malekloo, A. Machine learning for energy prediction in smart homes: A survey. Sustainable Cities and Society, 101, 104457 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104457.

6. Ji, Y., Zhu, Y., Lu, S., Yang, L., Liew, A.W.-C.: Wtc-ipst: A deep learning framework for short-term electric load forecasting with multi-scale feature extraction. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24, 113907 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113907.

7. Faria, P., & Vale, Z. Demand Response in Smart Grids. Energies, 16 (2), 863 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020863.

8. Wang, Y., Zhang, N., Zhuo, Z., Kang, C., Kirschen, D. Mixed-Integer Linear Programming-Based Optimal Configuration Planning for Energy Hub: Starting from Scratch. Applied Energy, 210 (2), 1141–1150 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.114.

9. Chandrasekaran, R., Paramasivan, S.K. Advances in deep learning techniques for short-term energy load forecasting applications: A review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 32 (2), 663-692 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10155-x.

10. Chen, Y., Liu, H., & Wu, Y. Integrating renewable energy forecasting with smart home demand response. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 65, 102918 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2025.102918.

11. Branco, N.W., Cavalca, M.S., Stefenon, S.F., & Leithardt, V.R. Wavelet LSTM for Fault Forecasting in Electrical Power Grids. Sensors, 22 (21), 8323 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218323.

12. Ning, Y., Kazemi, H., & Tahmasebi, P. A comparative machine learning study for time series oil production forecasting: ARIMA, LSTM, and Prophet. Computers and Geosciences, 164, 105126 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105126.

13. Sun, Y., Zhang, H., & Li, Y. Deep learning approaches for household load forecasting: A comparative analysis. Energy and Buildings, 254, 111608 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111608.

14. Ghadertootoonchi, A., Moeini-Aghtaie, M., Davoudi, M. AHybrid Linear Programming-Reinforcement Learning Method for Optimal Energy Hub Management. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 14 (1), 157–166 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2022.3197458.

15. Ma, P., Cui, S., Chen, M., Zhou, S., Wang, K. Review of family-level short-term load forecasting and its application in household energy management system. Energies, 16 (15), 5809–5825 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16155809.

16. Du, S., Li, T., Yang, Y., & Horng, S. Multivariate time series forecasting via attention-based encoderdecoder framework. Neurocomputing, 388, 269–279 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.12.118.

17. Perçuku, A., Minkovska, D., Hinov, N. Enhancing Electricity Load Forecasting with Machine Learning and Deep Learning. Technologies, 13 (2), 70–90 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies13020059.

18. Santoro, D., Ciano, T. & Ferrara, M. A comparison between machine and deep learning models on high stationarity data. Scientific Reports, 14 (1), 19409–1420 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70341-6.

19. Bodenschatz, N., Eider M., & Berl, A. Mixed-Integer-Linear-Programming Model for the Charging Scheduling of Electric Vehicle Fleets. 2020 10th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT), Deggendorf, Germany, 741–746 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT49673.2020.9208875.

20. Dukpa, A., & Butrylo, B. MILP-Based Profit Maximization of Electric Vehicle Charging Station Based on Solar and EV Arrival Forecasts. Energies, 15 (15), 5760 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155760.

21. Murray, D., Stankovic, L. & Stankovic, V. An electrical load measurements dataset of United Kingdom households from a two-year longitudinal study. Scientific Data, 4, 160122–160130 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.122.

22. Willmott, C.J. & Matsuura, K. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research, 30 (1), 79–82 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3354/cr030079.

23. Chai, T. & Draxler, R.R. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geoscientific Model Development, 7, 1247–1250 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014.

24. Kvålseth, T.O. Cautionary note about R². The American Statistician, 39 (4), 279–285 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1985.10479448.

25. Tofallis, C. A better measure of relative prediction accuracy for model selection and model estimation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66 (8), 1352–1362 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.103.