Preview

Herald of the Kazakh-British technical university

Advanced search

FUZZY LOGIC APPROACH FOR VISUAL ANALYSIS OF WEBSITES WITH K-MEANS CLUSTERING-BASED COLOR EXTRACTION

https://doi.org/10.55452/1998-6688-2024-21-4-10-21

Abstract

Websites form the foundation of the Internet, serving as platforms for disseminating information and accessing digital resources. They allow users to engage with a wide range of content and services, enhancing the Internet's utility for all. The aesthetics of a website play a crucial role in its overall effectiveness and can significantly impact user experience, engagement, and satisfaction. This paper examines the importance of website design aesthetics in enhancing user experience, given the increasing number of internet users worldwide. It emphasizes the significant impact of first impressions, often formed within 50 milliseconds, on users' perceptions of a website's appeal and usability. We introduce a novel method for measuring website aesthetics based on color harmony and font popularity, using fuzzy logic to predict aesthetic preferences. We collected our own dataset, consisting of nearly 200 popular and frequently used website designs, to ensure relevance and adaptability to the dynamic nature of web design trends. Dominant colors from website screenshots were extracted using k-means clustering. The findings aim to improve understanding of the relationship between aesthetics and usability in website design.

About the Authors

T. Abildayeva
Kazakh-British Technical University
Kazakhstan

Master student

Almaty

 



P. Shamoi
Kazakh-British Technical University
Kazakhstan

PhD in Engineering, Professor

Almaty



References

1. W.A. Social and Hootsuite, DIGITAL 2024: GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPORT, Jan 2024, https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-global-overview-report.

2. Anderson N.H. Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic Press, 1981.

3. Schenkman B.N. and J ̈onsson F.U. Aesthetics and preferences of web pages, Behaviour and Information Technology, 2000, vol. 19, pp. 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/014492900750000063.

4. Tractinsky N., Katz A., and Ikar D. What is beautiful is usable, Interacting with Computers, 2000, vol. 13, pp. 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00031-X.

5. Tseng P.-Y. and Lee S.-F. The impact of web visual aesthetics on purchase intention, 2019, pp. 28–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECICE47484.2019.8942664.

6. Lindgaard G., Fernandes G., Dudek C., and Brown J. Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behaviour and IT, 2006, vol. 25, pp. 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330448.

7. Garrett J. The Elements of User Experience: User-Centered Design for the Web and Beyond, 2010.

8. Mohamad Zain J., Tey M. and Soon G. Using aesthetic measurement application (ama) to measure aesthetics of web page interfaces, 2008, pp. 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNC.2008.764.

9. Filonik D. and Baur D. Measuring aesthetics for information visualization, 2009, pp. 579–584. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2009.94.

10. Coursaris C. Exploring the relationship between aesthetics and usability, 2007.

11. Lee S. and Koubek R. Users’ perceptions of usability and aesthetics as criteria of pre- and post-use preferences, European J. of Industrial Engineering, 2012, vol. 6. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2012.044812.

12. Geissler G., Zinkhan G., and Watson R. The influence of home page complexity on consumer attention, attitudes, and purchase intent, Journal of Advertising, 2013, vol. 35, pp. 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2006.10639232.

13. Nadkarni S., Gupta R. A task-based model of percieved website complexity, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2007, vol. 31, pp. 501–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148805.

14. Tuch A.N., Bargas-Avila J.A., Opwis K., and Wilhelm F.H. Visual complexity of websites: Effects on users’ experience, physiology, performance, and memory, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2009, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 703–715. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107158190900055X.

15. Sonderegger A., Sauer J. The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability, Applied ergonomics, 2009, vol. 41, pp. 403–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.09.002.

16. Lindgaard G., Dudek C., Sen D., Sumegi L., and Noonan P. An exploration of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepages, ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 2011, vol. 18, p. 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/1959022.1959023.

17. Shamoi P., Inoue A., and H. Kawanaka. Modeling aesthetic preferences: Color coordination and fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2020, vol. 395, pp. 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2019.02.014.

18. Shamoi P., Inoue A., and Kawanaka H. Color aesthetics and context-dependency, in SCIS-ISIS 2022, 2022, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCISISIS55246.2022.10001872.

19. Shamoi P., Muratbekova M., Izbassar A., Inoue A., and Kawanaka H. Towards a universal understanding of color harmony: Fuzzy approach, in Fuzzy Systems and Data Mining IX. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press, 2023, pp. 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460355.1460357.

20. Schenkman B. and J ̈onsson F. Aesthetics and preferences of web pages, Behaviour and Information Technology, 2000, vol. 19. https://doi.org/10.1080/014492900750000063.

21. Tuch A., Presslaber E., St ̈ocklin M., Opwis K., and Bargas-Avila J. The role of visual complexity and prototypicality regarding first impression of websites: Working towards understanding aesthetic judgments, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2012, vol. 70, pp. 794–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.06.003.

22. Lindgaard G. Does emotional appeal determine perceived usability of web sites, in Proceedings of CybErg: the second international cyberspace conference on ergonomics. The International Ergonomics Association Press, Curtin University, 1999, pp. 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9054-0.

23. Coursaris C. and Kripintris K. Web aesthetics and usability: An empirical study of the effects of white space. IJEBR, 2012, vol. 8, pp. 35–53. https://doi.org/10.4018/jebr.2012010103.

24. Pracejus J., Olsen G., and O’Guinn T. How nothing became something: White space, rhetoric, history, and meaning, Journal of Consumer Research, 2006, vol. 33, pp. 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/504138.

25. Zhang Y. Web Design. Southwest China Normal University Press, 2015.

26. Bojadziev G. and Bojadziev M. Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, Applications. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, Jan. 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/2867.

27. Shamoi P., Sansyzbayev D., and N. Abiley. Comparative overview of color models for content-based image retrieval,” in 2022 International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST), 2022, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIST54437.2022.9945709.

28. Ualibekova A. and Shamoi P. Music emotion recognition using k-nearest neighbors algorithm, in 2022 International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST), 2022, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIST54437.2022.9945814.


Review

For citations:


Abildayeva T., Shamoi P. FUZZY LOGIC APPROACH FOR VISUAL ANALYSIS OF WEBSITES WITH K-MEANS CLUSTERING-BASED COLOR EXTRACTION. Herald of the Kazakh-British technical university. 2024;21(4):10-21. https://doi.org/10.55452/1998-6688-2024-21-4-10-21

Views: 541


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-6688 (Print)
ISSN 2959-8109 (Online)