COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF X-RAY LUMINOSITY OF PERSISTENT AND TRANSIENT HIGH-MASS X-RAY BINARIES

High-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs) are commonly divided into persistent sources, which emit X-rays steadily over long periods, and transient sources, which remain mostly in a quiescent state and exhibit episodic X-ray outbursts. The aim of this work is to statistically compare the X-ray luminosity properties of these two classes, focusing on the maximum luminosity and the luminosity variability range . For this purpose, catalog data for Galactic HMXB pulsars were used, including 18 persistent and 64 transient systems. The distributions of and were analyzed using histograms, box plots, cumulative distribution functions (CDFs), and the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test. It is shown that both classes reach similar values of on the order of – erg/s), with no statistically significant difference between their distributions. However, transient systems exhibit a much wider luminosity variability range, reaching increases of 4–5 orders of magnitude (up to ), whereas persistent sources typically show lower variability. This difference is statistically confirmed, with transients demonstrating significantly higher variability p ≈ 0.05). Thus, the main distinction between persistent and transient HMXBs lies not in their peak X-ray luminosity, but in their accretion regime. In persistent systems, the compact object continuously accretes matter from a relatively stable stellar wind of an OB supergiant, resulting in steady X-ray emission. In contrast, transient systems are characterized by intermittent accretion (for example, episodic mass capture from a Be-star circumstellar disc), which leads to their extreme luminosity variability.

1. Reig, P. Be/X-ray binaries. Astrophysics and Space Science, 332 (1–2), 1–29 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-010-0575-8

2. Tauris, T.M., van den Heuvel, E.P.J. Formation and evolution of compact stellar X-ray sources. In: Compact Stellar X-ray Sources (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 623–665 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511536281.017

3. Frank, J., King, A., Raine, D. Accretion Power in Astrophysics. 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164245

4. Kreykenbohm, I., et al. High variability in Vela X-1: giant flares and off states. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 492 (2), 511–525 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200809956

5. Chaty, S. High-mass X-ray binaries: optical/infrared counterparts and evolution. Advances in Space Research, 52 (12), 2132–2142 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.09.010

6. Okazaki, A.T., Negueruela, I. A model for the circumstellar disc of Be/X-ray binaries. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 377 (1), 161–174 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20011083

7. Sidoli, L., Paizis, A., Postnov, K. INTEGRAL study of temporal properties of bright flares in supergiant fast X-ray transients. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 457 (4), 3693–3701 (2016). https:// doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw237

8. Walter, R., Lutovinov, A.A., Bozzo, E., Tsygankov, S.S. High-mass X-ray binaries in the Milky Way: a closer look with INTEGRAL. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 23 (1), 1–71 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-015-0082-6

9. Kim, H., et al. Catalog of Galactic X-ray pulsars and high-mass X-ray binaries. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 267 (2), article 44 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ace68f

10. Wilson-Hodge, C.A., et al. NICER and Fermi GBM observations of the first Galactic ultraluminous X-ray pulsar Swift J0243.6+6124. The Astrophysical Journal, 863 (1), article 9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aace60

11. Tsygankov, S.S., Doroshenko, V., Mushtukov, A.A., et al. Discovery of pulsations from a ULX transient in our Galaxy: Swift J0243.6+6124. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 479 (1), L134–L138 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/sly116

12. Antoniou, V., Zezas, A., Hatzidimitriou, D., Kalogera, V. Star formation history and X-ray binary populations: the case of the Small Magellanic Cloud. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 716 (2), L140–L145 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/716/2/L140

13. Lutovinov, A., Revnivtsev, M., Gilfanov, M., Sunyaev, R. INTEGRAL insight into the inner Galaxy: population of X-ray binaries. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 444 (2), 821–829 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20042392

14. Mushtukov, A.A., Verhagen, P.A., Tsygankov, S.S., Lutovinov, A.A., Poutanen, J. On the magnetic field of the first Galactic ultraluminous X-ray pulsar Swift J0243.6+6124. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 474 (1), L134–L138 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/sly116

15. Raguzova, N.V., Popov, S.B. Be–X-ray binaries and candidates. Astronomy Reports, 49 (8), 696–708 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/10556790500497311