DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMATED CONTROL SYSTEM FOR CEMENT PRODUCTION PROCESS

This paper employs cutting-edge control strategies, including PID regulation, to manage the dynamic and time-sensitive processes inherent in cement manufacturing. The Honeywell C300 controller is utilized to implement a robust and scalable system capable of adapting to the demands of high temperatures, material flow variations, and operational disturbances. Mathematical modeling and simulation tools, such as MATLAB, are used to analyze the system’s stability, as well as to obtain control parameters, allowing for predictive and adaptive management of crucial variables such as temperature and flow rate. This effort is important for more than just improving operational efficiency; it also contributes to sustainability by optimizing energy use and reducing waste. By integrating with worldwide initiatives to lessen the environmental effect of industrial processes, the system illustrates how automation may transform the cement manufacturing process. This article explores the control system’s technological underpinnings, design techniques, and practical implementations, providing insights into its transformational potential.

1. Tleubaev, T.E., and Omarbaeva, S.T. Sovremennoe sostojanie cementnoj promyshlennosti v Respublike Kazahstan (2021).

2. Mittal, A., and Rakshit, D. Utilization of cement rotary kiln waste heat for calcination of phosphogypsum. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 231 (9), 1670–1679 (2020).

3. Stability of systems with delay. URL: https://vse-studentu.ru/

4. Duan, W., Li, Y., and Chen, J. An enhanced stability criterion for linear time-delayed systems via new Lyapunov–Krasovskii functionals. Advances in Difference Equations, 25, 197–227 (2020).

5. Modern technologies of cement production (2022). URL: https://cementum.ru/

6. Sousa, V., and Bogas, J.A. Comparison of energy consumption and carbon emissions from clinker and recycled cement production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 306, 127277 (2021).

7. Aldina, S., Sutikno, J.P., and Handogo, R. Implementation of a mathematical modelling of rotary cement kilns. IPTEK The Journal for Technology and Science, 31 (1), 1–10 (2019).

8. Kula, K.S. Tuning a PI/PID controller with direct synthesis to obtain a non-oscillatory response of time-delayed systems. Applied Sciences, 14 (13), 5468 (2024).

9. George, T., and Ganesan, V. Optimal tuning of PID controller in time delay system: A review on various optimization techniques. Chemical Product and Process Modeling, 17 (1), 1–28 (2022).

10. Divakar, K., et al. A technical review on IMC-PID design for integrating process with dead time. IEEE Access (2024).

11. Li, X.G., et al. Characterizing PID controllers for linear time-delay systems: A parameter-space approach. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 66 (10), 4499–4513 (2020).

12. Porhalo, V.A., Rubanov, V.G., and Shaptala, V.G. Avtomatizacija pechi obzhiga klinkera na osnove kaskadnoj i mnogosvjaznoj sistem upravlenija. Vestnik Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnologicheskogo universiteta im. V.G. Shuhova, 2, 69–72 (2013).

13. Zanoli, S.M., Pepe, C., and Astolfi, G. Advanced process control for clinker rotary kiln and grate cooler. Sensors, 23 (5), 2805 (2023).

14. Zhang, R., Wang, X., and Yu, H. Application of humanoid intelligent control system in cement clinker calcination process. Proceedings of the 34th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), 1550–1554 (2022).

15. Hernandez, J.S., Rivas-Perez, R., and Moriano, J.J.S. Design of a generalized predictive controller for temperature control in a cement rotary kiln. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 16 (4), 1015–1021 (2018).

16. Ali, A.M., Tabares, J.D., and McGinley, M.W. A machine learning approach for clinker quality prediction and nonlinear model predictive control design for a rotary cement kiln. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing and Processing, 4 (4), e10137 (2022).