<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kaz29</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Казахстанско-Британского технического университета</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Herald of the Kazakh-British Technical University</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1998-6688</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2959-8109</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Казахстанско-Британский Технический Университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55452/1998-6688-2026-23-1-385-394</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">kaz29-2532</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>НЕФТЕГАЗОВАЯ ИНЖЕНЕРИЯ И ГЕОЛОГИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>OIL AND GAS ENGINEERING, GEOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ОСОБЕННОСТИ ТЕМПЕРАТУРНОГО РЕЖИМА ПРИЗАБОЙНОЙ ЗОНЫ ПРИ ГИДРОРАЗРЫВЕ ПЛАСТА И ИХ ВЛИЯНИЕ НА ПОДБОР БРЕЙКЕРА</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>FEATURES OF THE NEAR-WELLBORE ZONE TEMPERATURE REGIME DURING HYDRAULIC FRACTURING AND ITS IMPACT ON BREAKER SELECTION</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5532-5808</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Нурташев</surname><given-names>A. T.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Nurtashev</surname><given-names>A. T.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>магистрант</p><p>г. Алматы</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Master’s student</p><p>Almaty</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">as.nurtashev@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Казахстанско-Британский технический университет<country>Казахстан</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Kazakh-British Technical University<country>Kazakhstan</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>03</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>385</fpage><lpage>394</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Нурташев A.T., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Нурташев A.T.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Nurtashev A.T.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnik.kbtu.edu.kz/jour/article/view/2532">https://vestnik.kbtu.edu.kz/jour/article/view/2532</self-uri><abstract><p>В условиях разработки нефтяных и газовых месторождений с повышенными и высокими пластовыми температурами эффективность операций гидроразрыва пласта (ГРП) в значительной степени определяется корректным выбором брейкерной системы, обеспечивающей контролируемое разрушение полисахаридного геля после завершения закачки и размещения проппанта. В традиционной практике проектирования ГРП тип и концентрация брейкера, как правило, подбираются исходя из статического значения пластовой температуры, тогда как изменения температурного режима в призабойной зоне в процессе закачки учитываются лишь в ограниченной степени. В работе представлены результаты анализа динамики пластовой температуры, зарегистрированной в режиме реального времени с использованием автономного глубинного термобарического датчика в ходе проведения операции ГРП, включающей нагнетательный тест, мини-ГРП и основной гидроразрыв. Установлено, что закачка жидкости гидроразрыва с поверхностной температурой порядка 20 °C приводит к быстрому снижению температуры в призабойной зоне на десятки градусов по сравнению с исходной пластовой температурой. Наличие технологических пауз сопровождается частичным восстановлением температуры, однако исходное тепловое состояние пласта не восстанавливается до начала последующих стадий. Полученные результаты показывают, что эффективная температура, определяющая поведение жидкости ГРП в течение значительной части операции, существенно отличается от статического пластового значения. Это расхождение оказывает влияние на кинетику разрушения геля и эффективность окислительных брейкеров персульфатного типа. Сопоставление промысловых температурных данных с результатами лабораторных реологических испытаний, выполненных на вискозиметре Chandler 5550, подтверждает необходимость учёта динамического температурного режима при подборе брейкерных систем. Учет фактической температурной истории операции повышает надежность выбора брейкера и способствует улучшению очистки трещины и повторяемости результатов ГРП в условиях высокотемпературных коллекторов.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In the development of oil and gas fields with elevated and high formation temperatures, the effectiveness of hydraulic fracturing (HF) operations is largely determined by the correct selection of the breaker system, which ensures controlled degradation of the polysaccharide gel after pumping and proppant placement. In conventional HF design practice, breaker type and concentration are typically selected based on a static formation temperature, while variations in the near-wellbore thermal regime during pumping are only partially considered. This study presents the results of an analysis of formation temperature dynamics recorded in real time using an autonomous downhole pressure–temperature gauge during an HF operation, including the injection test, mini-frac, and main fracturing stages. It was established that injection of fracturing fluid at a surface temperature of approximately 20 °C leads to a rapid reduction of near-wellbore temperature by several tens of degrees relative to the initial formation temperature. Operational pauses result in partial temperature recovery; however, the original thermal state is not restored before subsequent stages. The results demonstrate that the effective temperature governing HF fluid performance during a significant portion of the operation differs substantially from the static formation temperature. This discrepancy affects gel degradation kinetics and the efficiency of persulfate-type oxidative breakers. Comparison of field temperature data with laboratory rheological test results obtained using a Chandler 5550 viscometer confirms the necessity of accounting for dynamic temperature conditions when selecting breaker systems. Incorporating actual thermal history into breaker design improves selection reliability and enhances fracture cleanup efficiency in hightemperature reservoirs.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>гидроразрыв пласта</kwd><kwd>жидкость гидроразрыв пласта</kwd><kwd>призабойная зона</kwd><kwd>брейкер</kwd><kwd>реологические свойства</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>hydraulic fracturing</kwd><kwd>fracturing fluid</kwd><kwd>reservoir temperature</kwd><kwd>near-wellbore</kwd><kwd>breaker</kwd><kwd>rheological properties</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Economides, M.J., and Nolte, K.G. Reservoir Stimulation, 3rd ed. (Chichester: John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2003).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Economides, M.J., and Nolte, K.G. Reservoir Stimulation, 3rd ed. (Chichester: John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2003).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Montgomery, C.T., and Smith, M.B. Hydraulic fracturing: History of an enduring technology. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 62 (12), 26–41 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2118/1210-0026-JPT</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Montgomery, C.T., and Smith, M.B. Hydraulic fracturing: History of an enduring technology. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 62 (12), 26–41 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2118/1210-0026-JPT</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gidley, J.L., Holditch, S.A., Nierode, D.E., and Veatch, R.W. Recent Advances in Hydraulic Fracturing (Richardson, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1989).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gidley, J.L., Holditch, S.A., Nierode, D.E., and Veatch, R.W. Recent Advances in Hydraulic Fracturing (Richardson, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1989).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Al-Muntasheri, G.A. Rheology of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2016).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Muntasheri, G.A. Rheology of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2016).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nasr-El-Din, H.A., and Al-Muntasheri, G.A. Evaluation of fracturing fluids under high-temperature conditions. SPE Production &amp; Operations, 23 (4), 473–483 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2118/100529-PA</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nasr-El-Din, H.A., and Al-Muntasheri, G.A. Evaluation of fracturing fluids under high-temperature conditions. SPE Production &amp; Operations, 23 (4), 473–483 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2118/100529-PA</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Al-Muntasheri, G.A., Hussein, I.A., and Sultan, A.S. Impact of temperature on the rheological properties of fracturing fluids. SPE Journal, 16 (1), 53–63 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2118/119887-PA</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Muntasheri, G.A., Hussein, I.A., and Sultan, A.S. Impact of temperature on the rheological properties of fracturing fluids. SPE Journal, 16 (1), 53–63 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2118/119887-PA</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barati, R., and Liang, J.-T. A review of fracturing fluid systems used for hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 131 (16), 40735 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.40735</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barati, R., and Liang, J.-T. A review of fracturing fluid systems used for hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 131 (16), 40735 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.40735</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hoffman, B.T., et al. Breaker selection and optimization for hydraulic fracturing fluids. SPE Journal, 10 (3), 257–264 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2118/82238-PA</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hoffman, B.T., et al. Breaker selection and optimization for hydraulic fracturing fluids. SPE Journal, 10 (3), 257–264 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2118/82238-PA</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sultan, A.S., Al-Muntasheri, G.A., and Hussein, I.A. High-temperature fracturing fluids: Challenges and recent advances. SPE Journal, 25 (2), 931–947 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2118/195415-PA</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sultan, A.S., Al-Muntasheri, G.A., and Hussein, I.A. High-temperature fracturing fluids: Challenges and recent advances. SPE Journal, 25 (2), 931–947 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2118/195415-PA</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ISO 13503-1. Oil and gas industries — Completion fluids and materials — Part 1: Measurement of viscous properties of completion fluids (Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2011).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ISO 13503-1. Oil and gas industries — Completion fluids and materials — Part 1: Measurement of viscous properties of completion fluids (Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2011).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Warpinski, N.R., and Teufel, L.W. Influence of temperature and fluid injection on fracture behavior. SPE Journal, 2 (2), 134–145 (1987). https://doi.org/10.2118/15215-PA</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Warpinski, N.R., and Teufel, L.W. Influence of temperature and fluid injection on fracture behavior. SPE Journal, 2 (2), 134–145 (1987). https://doi.org/10.2118/15215-PA</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barree, R.D., and Conway, M.W. Temperature effects during hydraulic fracturing treatments. SPE Production &amp; Facilities, 9 (4), 238–244 (1994). https://doi.org/10.2118/25933-PA</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barree, R.D., and Conway, M.W. Temperature effects during hydraulic fracturing treatments. SPE Production &amp; Facilities, 9 (4), 238–244 (1994). https://doi.org/10.2118/25933-PA</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ramey, H.J. Wellbore heat transmission. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 14 (4), 427–435 (1962). https://doi.org/10.2118/96-PA</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ramey, H.J. Wellbore heat transmission. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 14 (4), 427–435 (1962). https://doi.org/10.2118/96-PA</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vernigora, D., et al. Comprehensive modeling of downhole temperature during hydraulic fracturing. SPE Journal, 23 (5), 1865–1880 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2118/181812-PA</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vernigora, D., et al. Comprehensive modeling of downhole temperature during hydraulic fracturing. SPE Journal, 23 (5), 1865–1880 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2118/181812-PA</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baihly, J.D., et al. Real-time diagnostics of hydraulic fracturing using downhole measurements. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference (2014). https://doi.org/10.2118/168596-MS</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baihly, J.D., et al. Real-time diagnostics of hydraulic fracturing using downhole measurements. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference (2014). https://doi.org/10.2118/168596-MS</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Al-Bazali, T.M., et al. Effect of fracturing-fluid temperature on cleanup efficiency. SPE Production &amp; Operations, 29 (1), 45–55 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2118/164034-PA</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Bazali, T.M., et al. Effect of fracturing-fluid temperature on cleanup efficiency. SPE Production &amp; Operations, 29 (1), 45–55 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2118/164034-PA</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
